NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 GPU Review & Benchmarks Prices Keep Falling
video description
Date: 2023-06-28
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 20
SW
The 4060 is compelling for Blender users currently, at least, and I'm one of them. It performs slightly better than a 3070 and with a 50% increase in samples/minute than a 3060. For the uninitiated, AMD cards have performed substantially worse in Blender due to lack of support (I believe the blame is more on AMD's side here), although, this may have changed recently with the release of Blender 3.5, but I'm unsure. That said, for Nvidia, the problem is used 3060tis with usually 1 year of transferrable warranty are clearly much better in games than the 4060, as expected, and cost maybe 50 to 100 cheaper than the latter, which has been decreasing lately relative to newly purchasable 3060tis also decreasing somewhat. A week ago, there was at least one new 3060ti that was at 440 CAD (including taxes/fees) crossborder. I'm assuming a new 4060 will cost similarly or more, but it could've been a one off sale.
I'm wondering if waiting is really worthwhile here. It's tough to decide, while still using a 1060, which is about 6x times worse than a 3060 in Blender and I've gotten around 40fps in Cyberpunk at 1080p with custom low to medium settings. I don't like either manufacturers' BS, with Nvidia being more egregious, but I doubt waiting for something like a 20 to 50 drop in coming months is really worthwhile. The 1060 still works great for the majority of my played games/tasks, but I was waiting to see what the 4060 was like. AV1 encoding is probably useful for content creators/Twitch streamers (assuming it's implemented) as well, which I've also dabbled in and might continue.
Anyway, this is tedious, as usual. Might just buy a used 3060ti and be done with it. Hope it wasn't abused. Even more tedium.
reply
The 4060 is compelling for Blender users currently, at least, and I'm one of them. It performs slightly better than a 3070 and with a 50% increase in samples/minute than a 3060. For the uninitiated, AMD cards have performed substantially worse in Blender due to lack of support (I believe the blame is more on AMD's side here), although, this may have changed recently with the release of Blender 3.5, but I'm unsure. That said, for Nvidia, the problem is used 3060tis with usually 1 year of transferrable warranty are clearly much better in games than the 4060, as expected, and cost maybe 50 to 100 cheaper than the latter, which has been decreasing lately relative to newly purchasable 3060tis also decreasing somewhat. A week ago, there was at least one new 3060ti that was at 440 CAD (including taxes/fees) crossborder. I'm assuming a new 4060 will cost similarly or more, but it could've been a one off sale.
I'm wondering if waiting is really worthwhile here. It's tough to decide, while still using a 1060, which is about 6x times worse than a 3060 in Blender and I've gotten around 40fps in Cyberpunk at 1080p with custom low to medium settings. I don't like either manufacturers' BS, with Nvidia being more egregious, but I doubt waiting for something like a 20 to 50 drop in coming months is really worthwhile. The 1060 still works great for the majority of my played games/tasks, but I was waiting to see what the 4060 was like. AV1 encoding is probably useful for content creators/Twitch streamers (assuming it's implemented) as well, which I've also dabbled in and might continue.
Anyway, this is tedious, as usual. Might just buy a used 3060ti and be done with it. Hope it wasn't abused. Even more tedium.
reply
theft
They're trying to further segment their gamer users from their enterprise (AI) users; this is why Nvlink is no longer available on geforce cards, as well as why Nvidia has been so stingy with the VRAM lately - they want to setup the paradigm that gamers don't need much VRAM, whereas _professional users_ (who are willing to pay a lot more money) do. Nvidia can't sell their 100k AI cards if customers can get the same performance at a fraction of the cost by buying a couple of Geforce cards, so they've nerfed the hell out of em.
Oh, you want what is essentially a 4090 but with 48GB ( 50) of VRAM? That'll be 7000.
They want to charge their big AI customers as much as possible, and to do they they're screwing gamers out of the 16GB of VRAM we need.
In the big data processing/AI world, there's a _massive_ advantage to having a ton of VRAM available to a single GPU. Often times it's the difference between a dataset fitting entirely in VRAM vs needing to be split up and re-aggregated later.
Unlike many other workloads, AI doesn't _really_ care that much about where it's being trained/run. If Nvidia didn't artificially restrict the 4090's capabilities in that area, it'd be much more cost-effectively to use Geforce cards rather than expensive AI cards. Nvidia doesn't want that - they wanna charge 5x more for the same product, and who can blame em?
A 16GB 4070 Ti would be an excellent card. I'm driving 1440p/165hz displays from a 4090, and you can do stuff like play Path-Traced Cyberpunk 100-144fps (DLSS3 on).
It's sad but there's no more-reasonably valued card that can do that right now. 4090 1440p is actually the best gaming experience you can get today, and that's kinda pathetic.
reply
They're trying to further segment their gamer users from their enterprise (AI) users; this is why Nvlink is no longer available on geforce cards, as well as why Nvidia has been so stingy with the VRAM lately - they want to setup the paradigm that gamers don't need much VRAM, whereas _professional users_ (who are willing to pay a lot more money) do. Nvidia can't sell their 100k AI cards if customers can get the same performance at a fraction of the cost by buying a couple of Geforce cards, so they've nerfed the hell out of em.
Oh, you want what is essentially a 4090 but with 48GB ( 50) of VRAM? That'll be 7000.
They want to charge their big AI customers as much as possible, and to do they they're screwing gamers out of the 16GB of VRAM we need.
In the big data processing/AI world, there's a _massive_ advantage to having a ton of VRAM available to a single GPU. Often times it's the difference between a dataset fitting entirely in VRAM vs needing to be split up and re-aggregated later.
Unlike many other workloads, AI doesn't _really_ care that much about where it's being trained/run. If Nvidia didn't artificially restrict the 4090's capabilities in that area, it'd be much more cost-effectively to use Geforce cards rather than expensive AI cards. Nvidia doesn't want that - they wanna charge 5x more for the same product, and who can blame em?
A 16GB 4070 Ti would be an excellent card. I'm driving 1440p/165hz displays from a 4090, and you can do stuff like play Path-Traced Cyberpunk 100-144fps (DLSS3 on).
It's sad but there's no more-reasonably valued card that can do that right now. 4090 1440p is actually the best gaming experience you can get today, and that's kinda pathetic.
reply
Crash
First of, thank you for great work! I have a proposal for an additional segment in your videos, for which testing should not be too difficult: idle power consumption of CPUs and GPUs.
I live in Germany with electricity currently costing 0.44 /kWh
I am probably not speaky only for myself when I say that most of the time using my computer not spent gaming or on productivity, but on mundane tasks such as browsing the internet, watching videos, looking and moving files and other such activities that consume close to no power.
I am therefore very interested in the idle power consumption of different products.
For example, my ...
i9 12900 consumed 9W idle
r9 5900X consumed 40W idle
3080 consumes 90W idle
there are things that would have been very good to know beforehand.
These 40W + 90W add up to 130W, which is more or less what I measured going into the PSU ( 145W idle)
What does this cost compared to a 10W idle 1060 6GB and a 10W 13500?
Assuming a PSU loss of 50% at low power, this would be a comparison between 145W and 40W idle. Thats 100W idle difference.
100W = 0.1kW
My computer runs idle for about 8 hours a day (I am a remote university student)
0.1 kW 365,25 days/year 8 h/day 0.44 /kWh = 128,57 /year IDLE power consumption.
I believe this is something one should be able to factor in when purchasing a product and getting this information is currently very difficult.
reply
First of, thank you for great work! I have a proposal for an additional segment in your videos, for which testing should not be too difficult: idle power consumption of CPUs and GPUs.
I live in Germany with electricity currently costing 0.44 /kWh
I am probably not speaky only for myself when I say that most of the time using my computer not spent gaming or on productivity, but on mundane tasks such as browsing the internet, watching videos, looking and moving files and other such activities that consume close to no power.
I am therefore very interested in the idle power consumption of different products.
For example, my ...
i9 12900 consumed 9W idle
r9 5900X consumed 40W idle
3080 consumes 90W idle
there are things that would have been very good to know beforehand.
These 40W + 90W add up to 130W, which is more or less what I measured going into the PSU ( 145W idle)
What does this cost compared to a 10W idle 1060 6GB and a 10W 13500?
Assuming a PSU loss of 50% at low power, this would be a comparison between 145W and 40W idle. Thats 100W idle difference.
100W = 0.1kW
My computer runs idle for about 8 hours a day (I am a remote university student)
0.1 kW 365,25 days/year 8 h/day 0.44 /kWh = 128,57 /year IDLE power consumption.
I believe this is something one should be able to factor in when purchasing a product and getting this information is currently very difficult.
reply
Anuj
I personally think Nvidia knows that most people who have bought a GPU in 2020 or later are not looking to upgrade right now, so even if they were to provide good hardware(which would cost more), they simply wouldn't be able to achieve the same volume of sales like they did with the 3000 series(also with inflation and dropping GPU demand and rising competition from consoles). So they are purposely providing lower tier hardware for the 4000 series to keep their costs lower and somehow maintain a decent profit margin for per unit sold, and if that's true then this also their best opportunity to leverage software technologies like DLSS and Frame Gen to somehow compete with Radeon 7000. I don't support Nvidia in any way(I am an Intel fan). But I guess this is a business strategy to maximize profit right now and also give everyone more of a reason to upgrade when 5000 series, or something like that comes out, when the 3000 series have aged a bit and people are looking to upgrade, and the XBX and PS5 are basically older consoles at that point. And by that time, from everything they learn from their new smaller manufacturing nodes, all the software(DLSS and Frame Gen), raytracing and efficiency would have developed to a point where the become a very viable option for everyone, that coupled with (hopefully) a solid hardware improvement will 5000 series a banger.
reply
I personally think Nvidia knows that most people who have bought a GPU in 2020 or later are not looking to upgrade right now, so even if they were to provide good hardware(which would cost more), they simply wouldn't be able to achieve the same volume of sales like they did with the 3000 series(also with inflation and dropping GPU demand and rising competition from consoles). So they are purposely providing lower tier hardware for the 4000 series to keep their costs lower and somehow maintain a decent profit margin for per unit sold, and if that's true then this also their best opportunity to leverage software technologies like DLSS and Frame Gen to somehow compete with Radeon 7000. I don't support Nvidia in any way(I am an Intel fan). But I guess this is a business strategy to maximize profit right now and also give everyone more of a reason to upgrade when 5000 series, or something like that comes out, when the 3000 series have aged a bit and people are looking to upgrade, and the XBX and PS5 are basically older consoles at that point. And by that time, from everything they learn from their new smaller manufacturing nodes, all the software(DLSS and Frame Gen), raytracing and efficiency would have developed to a point where the become a very viable option for everyone, that coupled with (hopefully) a solid hardware improvement will 5000 series a banger.
reply
denvera1g1
As per several different dictionaries
Low end is defined as the products at the lower cost of a given product family(the lower third price).
Examples of low end cards
RTX 4060, RTX 4060TI, and RTX 4070
There is no dollar ammount that defines low end.
What defines low end, is the price difference between the most expensive, and least expensive product a company makes within a given brand, say Geforce instead of Quadro or Tesla,
So if the lowest end card is 299, and the highest end card is 1600, and there are many cards in between, you basically take that 1300 price difference, cut it into equal 3rds, then anything that falls into the lower third is low end middle third is mid range, and upper third is high end, so from 299 to 732 is by definition low end, from 732 to 1165 is mid range, and from 1165 to 1600 is high end
reply
As per several different dictionaries
Low end is defined as the products at the lower cost of a given product family(the lower third price).
Examples of low end cards
RTX 4060, RTX 4060TI, and RTX 4070
There is no dollar ammount that defines low end.
What defines low end, is the price difference between the most expensive, and least expensive product a company makes within a given brand, say Geforce instead of Quadro or Tesla,
So if the lowest end card is 299, and the highest end card is 1600, and there are many cards in between, you basically take that 1300 price difference, cut it into equal 3rds, then anything that falls into the lower third is low end middle third is mid range, and upper third is high end, so from 299 to 732 is by definition low end, from 732 to 1165 is mid range, and from 1165 to 1600 is high end
reply
Christos
By now, well a good time now, but definetely now, it is ABUNDANTLY clear that Nvidia IS NOT selling you a GPU at this tier.
Actually 4070 is higher-to-lower the last card , marginally.
What they are selling you is Frame Regen. Simple as that. They are selling you a yet unready sewn together ultra-proprietary technology and are SILENTLY ENFORCING you to use it, to get what you hoped for and then some .
BUT even then , the tech still has glitches (so it is not quite ready ) AND it is also per-game basis !
So in conclusion, to add insult to injury, what Nvidia is selling you is an UNFINISHED product that you also hope the developing studio of said game has paid extra workhours its devs to implement DLSS3 , so that YOU might get what YOU paid and hoped for .
I call pitchfork.
reply
By now, well a good time now, but definetely now, it is ABUNDANTLY clear that Nvidia IS NOT selling you a GPU at this tier.
Actually 4070 is higher-to-lower the last card , marginally.
What they are selling you is Frame Regen. Simple as that. They are selling you a yet unready sewn together ultra-proprietary technology and are SILENTLY ENFORCING you to use it, to get what you hoped for and then some .
BUT even then , the tech still has glitches (so it is not quite ready ) AND it is also per-game basis !
So in conclusion, to add insult to injury, what Nvidia is selling you is an UNFINISHED product that you also hope the developing studio of said game has paid extra workhours its devs to implement DLSS3 , so that YOU might get what YOU paid and hoped for .
I call pitchfork.
reply
Lauri
Very nice of Nvidia for providing us a video card on top of the privilege of using their magical, nigh world peace ensuring DLSS technology. I mean it's practically charity.
Look, I'm tired of complaining at this point. Video gaming isn't a right, and high quality video gaming most definitely isn't. But as far as I'm concerned performance components should sell based on the merits of the hardware itself, not because we have a helping piece of software that turns them from a bad deal to an okay deal. Nvidia has done an amazing job on DLSS and they know it. If Nvidia starts marketing their products differently and actually increases the transparency on software technology vs. hardware technology within their product stack, then it's a different discussion.
reply
Very nice of Nvidia for providing us a video card on top of the privilege of using their magical, nigh world peace ensuring DLSS technology. I mean it's practically charity.
Look, I'm tired of complaining at this point. Video gaming isn't a right, and high quality video gaming most definitely isn't. But as far as I'm concerned performance components should sell based on the merits of the hardware itself, not because we have a helping piece of software that turns them from a bad deal to an okay deal. Nvidia has done an amazing job on DLSS and they know it. If Nvidia starts marketing their products differently and actually increases the transparency on software technology vs. hardware technology within their product stack, then it's a different discussion.
reply
MrDrTheJniac
People not buying stuff makes price go down.
Clearly you have not looked at housing/rent here in the Greater Vancouver Area. Or RTX 4080s.
The card seems okay for 1080p, which is still the most used resolution by far, but it is definitely not what it should be for the price. NVidia really blew it with these 60-tier cards, with the bus width making these feel more like they were quickly hacked out five minutes before closing to fill a space in the product line than like they received care and attention. Lastly, to bring up price again, as someone who spent about 600 CAD on his GTX 980, spending almost as much on a 60-tier card brings tears to the eyes.
reply
People not buying stuff makes price go down.
Clearly you have not looked at housing/rent here in the Greater Vancouver Area. Or RTX 4080s.
The card seems okay for 1080p, which is still the most used resolution by far, but it is definitely not what it should be for the price. NVidia really blew it with these 60-tier cards, with the bus width making these feel more like they were quickly hacked out five minutes before closing to fill a space in the product line than like they received care and attention. Lastly, to bring up price again, as someone who spent about 600 CAD on his GTX 980, spending almost as much on a 60-tier card brings tears to the eyes.
reply
Rafael
well idk about all the tech aspects of the card, but i can tell you that power consumption is a extreme important aspect for low end GPUs, in fact a LOT more than high end...whoever is gonna pay 3k for a GPU is not really concerned with the Energy bill. Also the 60 serie is notorious used for work where some graphic power is need but people aren't concern if extreme large images (architecture and small design studios)...that been said a little more power usege and a 12gb vram would be a must... the 8gb (same as the 3060) is the thing that is stopping me form upgrade from a 2060...and i know the 16gb version will be complite overpriced =/
reply
well idk about all the tech aspects of the card, but i can tell you that power consumption is a extreme important aspect for low end GPUs, in fact a LOT more than high end...whoever is gonna pay 3k for a GPU is not really concerned with the Energy bill. Also the 60 serie is notorious used for work where some graphic power is need but people aren't concern if extreme large images (architecture and small design studios)...that been said a little more power usege and a 12gb vram would be a must... the 8gb (same as the 3060) is the thing that is stopping me form upgrade from a 2060...and i know the 16gb version will be complite overpriced =/
reply
itech
Its nice to see we have choices now.
And I don t find the 4060 as bad a buy as the rest of the 40 series. Realistically you are paying an extra 30% more than its worth but that s just the normal nvidia tax that you will likely get some back with the higher resale value these command.
If I was buying a gpu today I would be looking hard at used 30 series. Forced to buy new ai think the 6700xt is the best option around this price point. But again it s nice to see some choices. Enjoy it now, without big profits to be made AMD has already scaled back new offerings. Rx7800 still nowhere to be found for example
reply
Its nice to see we have choices now.
And I don t find the 4060 as bad a buy as the rest of the 40 series. Realistically you are paying an extra 30% more than its worth but that s just the normal nvidia tax that you will likely get some back with the higher resale value these command.
If I was buying a gpu today I would be looking hard at used 30 series. Forced to buy new ai think the 6700xt is the best option around this price point. But again it s nice to see some choices. Enjoy it now, without big profits to be made AMD has already scaled back new offerings. Rx7800 still nowhere to be found for example
reply
Hofnaerrchen
22:15 I highly disagree! You're right that it might not be number one criteria in deciding what GPU to buy, but with rising temperatures everyone should ALWAYS consider power consumption whenever buying anything consuming power - it doesn't matter if it is electricity or any other kind of. For a single consumer it may not make a bit difference but - in the case products sell very good - we are not talking about single digit numbers but at least high hundred thousands and the combined power consumption is what makes the difference. START THINKING BEYOND THE SINGLE CONSUMER HORIZON!
reply
22:15 I highly disagree! You're right that it might not be number one criteria in deciding what GPU to buy, but with rising temperatures everyone should ALWAYS consider power consumption whenever buying anything consuming power - it doesn't matter if it is electricity or any other kind of. For a single consumer it may not make a bit difference but - in the case products sell very good - we are not talking about single digit numbers but at least high hundred thousands and the combined power consumption is what makes the difference. START THINKING BEYOND THE SINGLE CONSUMER HORIZON!
reply
3polygons
The power argument is strong for users buying it for continuous apps' daily work : AI (sadly ....), 3D and 2D GPU accelerated apps. 3D and video rendering often in PCs for very long hours per day, the saving could be much larger than even what they published (specially in EU). And yep, much more environmentally friendly, in some scenarios it is like 70 watts less than the 7600.
Edit: Also the heat and noise, specially in these applications. There are some very warm regions in EU, and of course, much more in other parts of the world (going worse year by year).
reply
The power argument is strong for users buying it for continuous apps' daily work : AI (sadly ....), 3D and 2D GPU accelerated apps. 3D and video rendering often in PCs for very long hours per day, the saving could be much larger than even what they published (specially in EU). And yep, much more environmentally friendly, in some scenarios it is like 70 watts less than the 7600.
Edit: Also the heat and noise, specially in these applications. There are some very warm regions in EU, and of course, much more in other parts of the world (going worse year by year).
reply
Deltarious
I'm still running a 1080Ti with a 7700k and I'm literally right now reaching the point where I'm looking at a system upgrade, both for gaming but also actual work use cases. Mainly the CPU isn't giving me what I need anymore, but also the 1080Ti to cut a long story short isn't in the most healthy state even though it still works meaning it makes the most sense for a complete refresh, so this kind of commentary on upgrade cycle pacing is very useful for me, even though as always it is quite frustrating to have to wait for sane pricing
reply
I'm still running a 1080Ti with a 7700k and I'm literally right now reaching the point where I'm looking at a system upgrade, both for gaming but also actual work use cases. Mainly the CPU isn't giving me what I need anymore, but also the 1080Ti to cut a long story short isn't in the most healthy state even though it still works meaning it makes the most sense for a complete refresh, so this kind of commentary on upgrade cycle pacing is very useful for me, even though as always it is quite frustrating to have to wait for sane pricing
reply
Sasha
As someone stuck with her 1060 6GB.. and starting to see struggles running games on my 1440p monitor above 60fps.. this SUCKS.
I've been waiting for two generations now. the 3000 series was touted as allllmost there! just wait for the 4000 series! and now the 4000 series is.. this? I don't know what to do anymore mannnn
I just want a good GPU that will last me another decade like this card has lasted me, anyone got good recommendations? Currently on an AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, if that makes any difference..
reply
As someone stuck with her 1060 6GB.. and starting to see struggles running games on my 1440p monitor above 60fps.. this SUCKS.
I've been waiting for two generations now. the 3000 series was touted as allllmost there! just wait for the 4000 series! and now the 4000 series is.. this? I don't know what to do anymore mannnn
I just want a good GPU that will last me another decade like this card has lasted me, anyone got good recommendations? Currently on an AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, if that makes any difference..
reply
Nathan
I strongly suspect the reason this generation is so bad is because it's development would have happened during the silicon shortage which means they were designed with the shortage in mind... Obviously not taking in mind that the shortage you know... Can end... Just like the much later budget skus of rx 6000 this generation has all the same cost cutting measures... I don't know why they wouldn't just hold off on the generation and explain the situation... Oh wait yeh I do.... Money money money
reply
I strongly suspect the reason this generation is so bad is because it's development would have happened during the silicon shortage which means they were designed with the shortage in mind... Obviously not taking in mind that the shortage you know... Can end... Just like the much later budget skus of rx 6000 this generation has all the same cost cutting measures... I don't know why they wouldn't just hold off on the generation and explain the situation... Oh wait yeh I do.... Money money money
reply
New
Nvidia has a point. With DLSS+Frame Generation and reasonable RT, why would you buy these knocks offs from Radeon or Intel?
The RTX 4060 will proceed to be the next dominant Graphics Card on the Steam Charts. Had a co-worker gush about the price to me, I believe he has an RTX 2060.
Now, if either Intel or Radeon actually competed in either of these things, that'd be different. Neither come across as appealing prospects to me.
reply
Nvidia has a point. With DLSS+Frame Generation and reasonable RT, why would you buy these knocks offs from Radeon or Intel?
The RTX 4060 will proceed to be the next dominant Graphics Card on the Steam Charts. Had a co-worker gush about the price to me, I believe he has an RTX 2060.
Now, if either Intel or Radeon actually competed in either of these things, that'd be different. Neither come across as appealing prospects to me.
reply
vinak
I went from a 980 Ti to a 1080 Ti. Skipped the 2080 because they were price gouged.
Waited a year and a half to buy a 3080 at MSRP. (thanks, EVGA) Skipping the 4080 in hopes the 5080 is at a better price point.
Otherwise, I'll be looking at AMD and maybe (hopefully) Intel for my next GPU.
(The first GPU I remember buying was a Radeon 9800 Pro. I don't remember what I had between that and the 980 Ti.)
reply
I went from a 980 Ti to a 1080 Ti. Skipped the 2080 because they were price gouged.
Waited a year and a half to buy a 3080 at MSRP. (thanks, EVGA) Skipping the 4080 in hopes the 5080 is at a better price point.
Otherwise, I'll be looking at AMD and maybe (hopefully) Intel for my next GPU.
(The first GPU I remember buying was a Radeon 9800 Pro. I don't remember what I had between that and the 980 Ti.)
reply
Mauricio
In my sh thole land, cause of a corrupt government, we have about 75% tax costs attached to anything coming from abroad(not just VAT but shipping and import taxes), so if a card is 850 dollars MSRP in the US, it's 1475 dollars here. A 4060 would be about 525 bucks, while I can buy a used 6700 XT for about 281 dollars (a TUF or Nitro+ no less) that beats the 4060 in how many games?! Just don't bother.
reply
In my sh thole land, cause of a corrupt government, we have about 75% tax costs attached to anything coming from abroad(not just VAT but shipping and import taxes), so if a card is 850 dollars MSRP in the US, it's 1475 dollars here. A 4060 would be about 525 bucks, while I can buy a used 6700 XT for about 281 dollars (a TUF or Nitro+ no less) that beats the 4060 in how many games?! Just don't bother.
reply
Asgaurd64
I Have not bought any nvidia card,since the 1080, due to two reasons. They price gouged us, during the mining boom, and then again in the pandemic. So why should I spend good money on a company that wants the rip me off. I just dont bother, I can live with my current GFX card (rx 6900) for the next 4 years easy. Im happy and dont feel like i have been conned.
reply
I Have not bought any nvidia card,since the 1080, due to two reasons. They price gouged us, during the mining boom, and then again in the pandemic. So why should I spend good money on a company that wants the rip me off. I just dont bother, I can live with my current GFX card (rx 6900) for the next 4 years easy. Im happy and dont feel like i have been conned.
reply
Mahmoud
IMPORTANT ,,
Since this card is only 8xPCIE-4 & Since many many users have older boards and cpus that support only PCIE-3 .. Can that affect the performance ?! just like the Rx 6500xt ?
of course the card have many issues already , but assuming if the card have a right price in the future , that could be ANOTHER downside that to be consider before buying
reply
IMPORTANT ,,
Since this card is only 8xPCIE-4 & Since many many users have older boards and cpus that support only PCIE-3 .. Can that affect the performance ?! just like the Rx 6500xt ?
of course the card have many issues already , but assuming if the card have a right price in the future , that could be ANOTHER downside that to be consider before buying
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
