VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Knowledge, science, education » Historical films
Calgacus: Last of the Free

Calgacus: Last of the Free

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
Calgacus: Last of the Free history: Tacitus was Agricolla's nephew which is very important as regards to his bias and account of the invasion of Pictland. As regards the Scots Gaels being hibernian (Irish) there is an equally compelling argument that they invaded Ireland from Dalriarda, due to the Grampian mountains. To date no battle field or archaeological evidence has been found to substantiate the battle of Mons grapuiss. It is likely the Picts used a scorched earth policy of guerilla warfare, as history has continually proved that fighting open field campaigns against professional armies is suicide. The tales of the defeat of Boudicca would of reached caladonia long before the armies crossed the fourth. Shortly after agricolla was recalled to Rome and a suitable propaganda story compiled for general consumption in Rome. The Romans buried anything metal that they couldn't carry and fell back to what would later become Hadrian's wall. Hardly the actions of a successful campaign and pacification of people. In many respects the Roman invasions were a dark age version of the American invasion of Vietnam. Who coincidently are still making films about how they won that war. The more we change the more we stay the same.
Date: 2022-09-10

Comments and reviews: 15


I know this video was posted a long time ago so theres not much hope on getting answers to my main question. But here goes.
Im currently writing a book about Celtic Btitain. Its historical fiction but i want it to be as factual as i can. Ive set it in and around 118AD. I'm going to investigate whether it was possible for the Celts to win back the whole of Britain even after Boudica's defeat. If one man/woman could have united not just the Celts of modern day Scotland but of England and Wales. Seeing as Gaul had the likes of Vercingetorix and Britain had Caratacus and Boudica. Ive only just recently heard of Calgacus and studying what little knowledge there id of him has done wonders for my book. Anyway heres my question.
Do we know specifically what tribe Calgacus was from?

reply

i dont know, something is really wrong with the history we learn in school. when i read and search about Celtic people, or Gaelic, or Illiryans or Scythians and some other group around the world, i see the same people.
tattoing, no writings, other called them barbarians (even if those people are far superiour in many things than those who write the history, great wariors and kings, simmilar legends and mythology, metal work ( especially gold) and many more things connecting these nations.
we can see maybe 70-80% truth about history, and the rest is a big lie.
we never see key elements to get the real picture, and i believe it is weirder than we can imagine.

reply

I just wanted to pick on the last two things said in this video: The Caledonians becoming the Picts and the Scots. I'm pretty sure that's incorrect. I seem to remember that the Picts may well have not even been akin to Britons and may be Scandinavian in origin, but I'd have to check on this. The Scots certainly came from Ireland though. This is pretty mainstream, so I really don't know why this is wrong here. In what is now Scotland, sure the Caledonians became what is now Scottish, but they didn't become the tribe known as the Scots. The Scots were Irish.
reply

At this point of time, this is the northernmost drive of the Roman Legion, however when Agricola was recalled to Rome the Roman drive which Almost conquering Scotland soon Big down. After abandoning Scotland the tribes there were free. TRAJAN did not interfere Caledonia, because he is busy Conquering DACIA, MESOPOTAMIA, and NABATAEA. However when Hdrian become the emperor, he built the Hadrians Wall, and it was superceded by the ANTONINE Wall of emperor ANTONINUS the Pius which marked the northernmost boundary of the Roman Empire.
reply

Your use of the term Celt is outdated. It's now recognized that the Britons were not Celts. In fact, the term is very misleading as the only true Celts (those who called themselves such) were from mid-north eastern Gaul. This loose use of the term is partly the fault of both Romans and Greeks, and the term is comparable to the term babarian. Celticism was a culture, not an identity or an ethnic grouping. I really think this term should be abandoned as it is so misused.
reply

We the Brythoniaid never referred to ourselves as Celts. Culture and ethnicity are determined by language, far more than race. From Cornwall to Scotland, there was one language. That language was and is Cymraeg, It is Cymraeg that defines us, not some Roman term of ethnicity. It is Cymraeg that gives us our Mythology, our history and our culture. It is the ancient language that defines who we were and who we are today
reply

This is a more accurate telling of the tale than most, and as you say, neither side truly won the battle, it was very much inconclusive (and Rome may have marginally won the battle, but they definitely lost the war) which is both a show of Romes weakness in the tough Caledonian landscape, and a show of Pictish/Caledonian strength and bravery in the face of a mighty enemy.
Great video!

reply

I don't like to contradict but the celtic sword was made also for thrusting, not only for slashing.
Could you please do something on the dumnonii, I noticed that there wasn't much information on the roman presence (apart from on Exeter, this plus the celtic language which resided there until the 18th century leads me to suspect that there was some kind of resistance.

reply

Not your fault but I'd look at Cartamundia and look at the edict Vespasian issued on discussing the turmoil of the Year of the Four Emperors and then look at the things Agricola focsed on in the years he was here. I think Roman soucres have been written to deliberately obfuscate and Cartamunda was probably who he was discussing re: Boudicca.
reply

The stirring speech attributed to Calgacus in the History by the roman writer Tacitus is pure fiction and a typical set speech employed by ancient historians like Thucydides to ornament their narratives. Anyway Calgacus is supposed to be the first scotsman of whom we know the name!
reply

The summary at the end is quite wrong. The Scots and the name hail from the Scotti of the west who spoke Gallic, not Pictish or whatever those people called it. Not a bad wee vid but the summary was obviously rushed and therefore inaccurate.
reply

Great video's so far! Do you think you could possibly do a video on Clontarf, since lent and Eater is coming it may be appropriate: ) Or maybe the skirmishes and battles of the Ulster tribes and the Vikings? Keep up the great work!
reply

Not just Scots some of us Aussies can still trace that lineage too some of the Noble lines Kings Lairds etc their descendants went all over the world.
reply

I got here (and learned something) looking for the piece of music 'Calgacus' by Edward McGuire. fantastic bagpipes by Robert Wallace at the end.
reply

I'm so glad I found you. it's so hard to find good dark age history in detail. I discovered you thru History with Hilbert.
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos