The REAL WINNER Of KSI vs Logan Paul, Instagram's Likes Controversy, Uber & Bolivia's Chaotic Future
video description
Date: 2019-11-12
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
Alexandra Gomez
Yes this is a long comment, but in order to get a clear picture of things, you need all the facts. Not just one sided lies. Let me clarify what is actually happening in Bolivia. Ive been watching what has been happening since before the election fraud. I have family in Bolivia. It has been so mis-represented. Bolvian presidents are only allowed to run for two terms, according to their constitution. Morales was able to run for a third because he claimed is was his birth right to do so. He got some ruling that sided with him. When is came to him running for a forth term, The people did not want him in office, so they went to vote. The election then was corrupted by fraud favoring Morales. The people knew they did not vote for him, so they held peaceful protests to defend their constitutional rights. They did not want a fraud in office. Let me clarify, they held PEACEFUL protests. They made it clear TIME and TIME again that they would not hurt a soul. They burned government buildings at most, but made it clear that they would never resort to violence on another human being. And not a single person was hurt due to them. On the other hand, MANY women who were part of the resistance have been kidnapped and raped as a form of intimidation. Most of these women being the families of the military and police. Not only that, Many people who are faces of these protests have received threats towards their lives and families. And many have disappeared. The resistance in Bolivia asked for the police and military to back them because they did not want to resort to violence and wanted protection. The military and police refused to follow Morales orders to arrest the protesters. Maduro advised Morales to resort to violence to ensure his power. Then the military and police both said they would be arresting anyone found with arms who was not authorized personal. They said that only their military and police should be carrying arms. (Maduro had sent people with weapons to lead pro-Morales protests. This was very dire to Bolivians because it ensured that their military would protect them from all the terror and backlash they have been facing. Many people have gone missing, daughter have been violated, and protestors homes and farms have been set to flames. Morales is completely gaslighting and any Bolvian national can tell you that. Everything he has claimed has happened to him is false, the Bolivian people said they would win without violence and did just that. It was him who tried to intimidate people into silence and his way into office. The people made it clear that they did not want him, and did not vote for him. Therefor Morales declaring that he should be president because he should be, against what the people want, literally makes him a dictator. Bolivia did not want to follow in Venezuelas, Nicaraguas, or Cubas steps. So they protested and of course Morales who has already been proven a fraud, is going to claim that he is the one being attacked. He is the only one who has hurt his own people behind closed doors. The only reason the police and military got involved, was because the people of Bolivia asked for protection and help. For once, I agreed with what Donald Trump had to say. And it is sad that he was the only one who correctly got a grasp of the situation. I despise Trump, but Im grateful that for once I can agree with my current president. Morales was a fraud, he has people hurt because they protested. And when the Bolivian people did not back down, he chose to blame them for what he did. The Bolvian people have been suffering for a while now and its a shame to see Morales try to victimize himself.
reply
Yes this is a long comment, but in order to get a clear picture of things, you need all the facts. Not just one sided lies. Let me clarify what is actually happening in Bolivia. Ive been watching what has been happening since before the election fraud. I have family in Bolivia. It has been so mis-represented. Bolvian presidents are only allowed to run for two terms, according to their constitution. Morales was able to run for a third because he claimed is was his birth right to do so. He got some ruling that sided with him. When is came to him running for a forth term, The people did not want him in office, so they went to vote. The election then was corrupted by fraud favoring Morales. The people knew they did not vote for him, so they held peaceful protests to defend their constitutional rights. They did not want a fraud in office. Let me clarify, they held PEACEFUL protests. They made it clear TIME and TIME again that they would not hurt a soul. They burned government buildings at most, but made it clear that they would never resort to violence on another human being. And not a single person was hurt due to them. On the other hand, MANY women who were part of the resistance have been kidnapped and raped as a form of intimidation. Most of these women being the families of the military and police. Not only that, Many people who are faces of these protests have received threats towards their lives and families. And many have disappeared. The resistance in Bolivia asked for the police and military to back them because they did not want to resort to violence and wanted protection. The military and police refused to follow Morales orders to arrest the protesters. Maduro advised Morales to resort to violence to ensure his power. Then the military and police both said they would be arresting anyone found with arms who was not authorized personal. They said that only their military and police should be carrying arms. (Maduro had sent people with weapons to lead pro-Morales protests. This was very dire to Bolivians because it ensured that their military would protect them from all the terror and backlash they have been facing. Many people have gone missing, daughter have been violated, and protestors homes and farms have been set to flames. Morales is completely gaslighting and any Bolvian national can tell you that. Everything he has claimed has happened to him is false, the Bolivian people said they would win without violence and did just that. It was him who tried to intimidate people into silence and his way into office. The people made it clear that they did not want him, and did not vote for him. Therefor Morales declaring that he should be president because he should be, against what the people want, literally makes him a dictator. Bolivia did not want to follow in Venezuelas, Nicaraguas, or Cubas steps. So they protested and of course Morales who has already been proven a fraud, is going to claim that he is the one being attacked. He is the only one who has hurt his own people behind closed doors. The only reason the police and military got involved, was because the people of Bolivia asked for protection and help. For once, I agreed with what Donald Trump had to say. And it is sad that he was the only one who correctly got a grasp of the situation. I despise Trump, but Im grateful that for once I can agree with my current president. Morales was a fraud, he has people hurt because they protested. And when the Bolivian people did not back down, he chose to blame them for what he did. The Bolvian people have been suffering for a while now and its a shame to see Morales try to victimize himself.
reply
Adam Rasmussen
Not that dictators follow laws, but eliminating term limits just removes a hurdle to that dystpoian reality. To call this a coup seems pretty disingenious from the same people who have been making political hay from 'impeach or bust' for 3 full years now, even if these current Trump corruption claims seem to have more teeth than their (and his) previous boondoggles. They call this a coup, yet Morales changed the law twice to permit himself unlimited time in office. He did so only after the idea was quashed by a referendum, the most democratically pure action a voting populous has to voice their opinion to government. When AOC, Ilhan Omar, and their social circles come out to play politik in favour of Morales, here, they really ought to reconsider what reaction they might have to Trump executing an order striking down presidential term lmits, possibly with the help of the Supreme Court. Because they are essentially supporting that exact thing when they support Morales right to govern. Otherwise, they're just sticking with this broader Socialist community they've become a part of without a care for the fact that theyre some of the largest hypocrites of convenience I think I've ever seen. They're in the DEMOCRATIC party, and when a country like Bolivia, with its history of political upheavel, has a chance to re-run a corrupted election, but (hopefully) fairly, they're of the opinion that government power grabs are a totally legit thing that elected leaders sometimes need to do. And that when USA voting stations stop reporting data for like 24 hours, only to have it come back up, but only after its been seen and manipulated by some party working for Trump, they won't see any problem with that, or allowing Trump to just hang around the Oval Office for another 10 years. The blinders these folks wear are just incredible.
reply
Not that dictators follow laws, but eliminating term limits just removes a hurdle to that dystpoian reality. To call this a coup seems pretty disingenious from the same people who have been making political hay from 'impeach or bust' for 3 full years now, even if these current Trump corruption claims seem to have more teeth than their (and his) previous boondoggles. They call this a coup, yet Morales changed the law twice to permit himself unlimited time in office. He did so only after the idea was quashed by a referendum, the most democratically pure action a voting populous has to voice their opinion to government. When AOC, Ilhan Omar, and their social circles come out to play politik in favour of Morales, here, they really ought to reconsider what reaction they might have to Trump executing an order striking down presidential term lmits, possibly with the help of the Supreme Court. Because they are essentially supporting that exact thing when they support Morales right to govern. Otherwise, they're just sticking with this broader Socialist community they've become a part of without a care for the fact that theyre some of the largest hypocrites of convenience I think I've ever seen. They're in the DEMOCRATIC party, and when a country like Bolivia, with its history of political upheavel, has a chance to re-run a corrupted election, but (hopefully) fairly, they're of the opinion that government power grabs are a totally legit thing that elected leaders sometimes need to do. And that when USA voting stations stop reporting data for like 24 hours, only to have it come back up, but only after its been seen and manipulated by some party working for Trump, they won't see any problem with that, or allowing Trump to just hang around the Oval Office for another 10 years. The blinders these folks wear are just incredible.
reply
Alice G
INSTAGRAM LIKES STORY: I don't really understand how that's supposed to positively impact what I assume to be the target: younger audience. I very much understand the danger to live for likes or attach your self worth to it. But how does it make it less mentally crippling if a kid is the only one who sees no one liked their selfie? Sure. I can't come around and be a dick and make fun of them because I can't see that. But if the stats are private, it means they see it. The biggest harm with anxiety is our self critique. Our inner bully. So. I dunno. Test it, I guess. It's better to try something than not do anything. What I'd like from Instagram is much much better reporting tools for when you witness someone breaking a guideline. Because if it doesn't fit in those tiny, tidy boxes that they suggest in their reporting tools, then you can't report it. There are plenty of violations out there that you can only report by tweeting at them, which, paradoxically, means bring them more views.
reply
INSTAGRAM LIKES STORY: I don't really understand how that's supposed to positively impact what I assume to be the target: younger audience. I very much understand the danger to live for likes or attach your self worth to it. But how does it make it less mentally crippling if a kid is the only one who sees no one liked their selfie? Sure. I can't come around and be a dick and make fun of them because I can't see that. But if the stats are private, it means they see it. The biggest harm with anxiety is our self critique. Our inner bully. So. I dunno. Test it, I guess. It's better to try something than not do anything. What I'd like from Instagram is much much better reporting tools for when you witness someone breaking a guideline. Because if it doesn't fit in those tiny, tidy boxes that they suggest in their reporting tools, then you can't report it. There are plenty of violations out there that you can only report by tweeting at them, which, paradoxically, means bring them more views.
reply
TheDaringPastry1313
Neither KSI or Logan Paul should go pro in boxing or MMA. That was an ugly thing to behold. KSI left himself open every slow wide swing he did where he was going for power. Logan Paul should have jabbed the whole fight, but I don't know what he was doing. The first two rounds were a lot of head locks and weird body shots that the ref kept warning about. As a viewer that found it online for free, yeah I would never pay for that crap, it wasn't that entertaining. I only watched it for the memes. My follow up to your question about how big it was? I posted a short clip about Logan's cheap uppercut where he held KSI's head with his left hand and the two cheap shots as he fell to the back of the head that cost him the 2 points. That video got around 173 RTs and 974 likes on Twitter. I have a total 131 followers on Twitter and I never get tweets to blow up. So yeah, there was a lot of buzz around the fight.
reply
Neither KSI or Logan Paul should go pro in boxing or MMA. That was an ugly thing to behold. KSI left himself open every slow wide swing he did where he was going for power. Logan Paul should have jabbed the whole fight, but I don't know what he was doing. The first two rounds were a lot of head locks and weird body shots that the ref kept warning about. As a viewer that found it online for free, yeah I would never pay for that crap, it wasn't that entertaining. I only watched it for the memes. My follow up to your question about how big it was? I posted a short clip about Logan's cheap uppercut where he held KSI's head with his left hand and the two cheap shots as he fell to the back of the head that cost him the 2 points. That video got around 173 RTs and 974 likes on Twitter. I have a total 131 followers on Twitter and I never get tweets to blow up. So yeah, there was a lot of buzz around the fight.
reply
Kurt
On Uber, I think people don't understand corporations. The CEO can't take back their stock or kick anyone off the board. He reports to the Board, they are his boss, they decide who sits in his seat, he doesn't decide who sits in theirs. And it's also the representative of the sovereign wealth fund who is on the Board, not the crown prince himself. I am not sure the crown prince is the sole owner of that fund (which would make it even harder to kick them from the board for something one owner did. I get his being tongue-tied. he doesn't want to create animosity and so doesn't want to denounce a guy who could influence the Board to fire him. He should have had the courage to at least say he agrees that the assassination was reprehensible, then point out that he can't simply get rid of directors, that that's on the shareholders (including those shareholders who happen to be criminals.
reply
On Uber, I think people don't understand corporations. The CEO can't take back their stock or kick anyone off the board. He reports to the Board, they are his boss, they decide who sits in his seat, he doesn't decide who sits in theirs. And it's also the representative of the sovereign wealth fund who is on the Board, not the crown prince himself. I am not sure the crown prince is the sole owner of that fund (which would make it even harder to kick them from the board for something one owner did. I get his being tongue-tied. he doesn't want to create animosity and so doesn't want to denounce a guy who could influence the Board to fire him. He should have had the courage to at least say he agrees that the assassination was reprehensible, then point out that he can't simply get rid of directors, that that's on the shareholders (including those shareholders who happen to be criminals.
reply
Aaron Tate
The situation in Bolivia is crazy. I think there is a very real possibility that some outside forces were at play here considering the history of politics in South America. Also, Morales seems to not be the best person ever. He pulled a Xi Jinping and removed term limits which is looks very bad and also the very shady vote count stuff. On the other hand there is all of his supporters in the government being forced to resign as well and one of his opponents stepping up to lead a transition government. I hope that Bolivians get a fair election and if they don't they need to continue peacefully protesting. Morales may have been an unsavory character but that doesn't necessarily make the people in his party bad people, nor does it automatically make his opposition the good guys. Lots of bad actors here and the Bolivian people deserve better.
reply
The situation in Bolivia is crazy. I think there is a very real possibility that some outside forces were at play here considering the history of politics in South America. Also, Morales seems to not be the best person ever. He pulled a Xi Jinping and removed term limits which is looks very bad and also the very shady vote count stuff. On the other hand there is all of his supporters in the government being forced to resign as well and one of his opponents stepping up to lead a transition government. I hope that Bolivians get a fair election and if they don't they need to continue peacefully protesting. Morales may have been an unsavory character but that doesn't necessarily make the people in his party bad people, nor does it automatically make his opposition the good guys. Lots of bad actors here and the Bolivian people deserve better.
reply
This episode Is about
This whole IG likes change is most likely just going to be another pain in my ass. As a fairly new and definitely unknown creator trying to successfully use IG to get my content in front of people is a nightmare. As it stands currently engagement is hard to come by because my followers dont even see my content when I post it. users like me have been asking for IG to bring back chronological viewing I myself dont get to see posts from even close friends all the time because if Im not commenting it seems as if the IG algorithm actively suppresses their posts. IG is filled with people who scroll and go and likes take a fraction of a second to do. i think IG doesnt see likes as a valuable form of engagement which I think will lead to more suppression of smaller creators but a public moves that make them look like they care.
reply
This whole IG likes change is most likely just going to be another pain in my ass. As a fairly new and definitely unknown creator trying to successfully use IG to get my content in front of people is a nightmare. As it stands currently engagement is hard to come by because my followers dont even see my content when I post it. users like me have been asking for IG to bring back chronological viewing I myself dont get to see posts from even close friends all the time because if Im not commenting it seems as if the IG algorithm actively suppresses their posts. IG is filled with people who scroll and go and likes take a fraction of a second to do. i think IG doesnt see likes as a valuable form of engagement which I think will lead to more suppression of smaller creators but a public moves that make them look like they care.
reply
kira0080
So the OAS release a report saying that there wasnt just manipulation but a lot of it in the vote counts, Morales steps down, then people call this a coup? Am I missing something here? Protestors resorting to violence is nothing new, especially when its proven that the leader was involved in corruption to keep him in office. But we dont just start calling that a coup. This is kind of response from citizens of a country is the norm. When they've been cheated they resort to violence. So unless they think that the OAS were lying and Carlos Mesa was conspiring and planning these attacks on government officials, they have no business calling this a coup. This wasnt one political group overthrowing another so they can install themselves into power, it was to have another and FAIR election process which was proven rigged.
reply
So the OAS release a report saying that there wasnt just manipulation but a lot of it in the vote counts, Morales steps down, then people call this a coup? Am I missing something here? Protestors resorting to violence is nothing new, especially when its proven that the leader was involved in corruption to keep him in office. But we dont just start calling that a coup. This is kind of response from citizens of a country is the norm. When they've been cheated they resort to violence. So unless they think that the OAS were lying and Carlos Mesa was conspiring and planning these attacks on government officials, they have no business calling this a coup. This wasnt one political group overthrowing another so they can install themselves into power, it was to have another and FAIR election process which was proven rigged.
reply
Petro Lukach
I am sorry, but when you see Corbyn putting out support for someone/something you can tell thats the wrong side. Clearly there are political biases here, if AOC, Corbyn and, for gods sake, Maduro are backing this guy, and calling this out as wrong, this has to be connected with their political alignment. Being from a country, where we had two revolutions in the last 15 years, and growing up through them, I can not be happy for people of Bolivia. A guy who clearly rigged the system to favor his way, corrupted the elective body and tried to establish a system like Russia or Venezuela where there is virtually no transition of power and transparency, is out. Thats the main thing. I am so happy for them, because they achieved that without huge numbers of casualties and in a relatively peaceful way.
reply
I am sorry, but when you see Corbyn putting out support for someone/something you can tell thats the wrong side. Clearly there are political biases here, if AOC, Corbyn and, for gods sake, Maduro are backing this guy, and calling this out as wrong, this has to be connected with their political alignment. Being from a country, where we had two revolutions in the last 15 years, and growing up through them, I can not be happy for people of Bolivia. A guy who clearly rigged the system to favor his way, corrupted the elective body and tried to establish a system like Russia or Venezuela where there is virtually no transition of power and transparency, is out. Thats the main thing. I am so happy for them, because they achieved that without huge numbers of casualties and in a relatively peaceful way.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
16:12
12:55
13:56
13:56
14:23