Halsey, Charli D'Amelio, Logic, Felony Charges After Viral Video, The EU's Historic Package
video description
Is he legit with his Bipolar stance of If I'm saying extremist shit, I'm manic. ? Or is he trying to munchausen clout for his next album?
I pray it isn't munchausen. Cause all the famous people who came out shitting on those who are laughing at Kanye will delete their tweets if Kanye gets exposed as a liar. Thus removing the exposure of mental health awareness for men.
Date: 2020-07-22
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
Simran
No, that castle doctrine is soooo ambiguous!
I'm surprised that such a wide law was allowed to passed and not checked by the courts yet.
Right to private defense of property (as per common law) exists when there is a threat/perceived threat of injury.
And the perception has to be reasonable in the legal sense.
None of these people were going for their house. They did nothing to induce fear in them.
And even in a gated community the whole neighborhood isn't their private property. By that logic if they see a man breaking into their neighbour's house they'd be justified in shooting him, even if it's the neighbour who unfortunately lost his keys. Now he's q dead man.
Don't tell me that's justified.
(Also anyone wondering, this actually is justifiable homicide if it's your own house. There's this case of a man killing his own kid who was breaking into the house late at night and the man thought it was a robber. He shot him. It was considered to be his right of private defense. He didn't go to jail but had to live with the fact he killed his own kid. This is actual case law. I don't remember the name. If anyone does please tell me)
reply
No, that castle doctrine is soooo ambiguous!
I'm surprised that such a wide law was allowed to passed and not checked by the courts yet.
Right to private defense of property (as per common law) exists when there is a threat/perceived threat of injury.
And the perception has to be reasonable in the legal sense.
None of these people were going for their house. They did nothing to induce fear in them.
And even in a gated community the whole neighborhood isn't their private property. By that logic if they see a man breaking into their neighbour's house they'd be justified in shooting him, even if it's the neighbour who unfortunately lost his keys. Now he's q dead man.
Don't tell me that's justified.
(Also anyone wondering, this actually is justifiable homicide if it's your own house. There's this case of a man killing his own kid who was breaking into the house late at night and the man thought it was a robber. He shot him. It was considered to be his right of private defense. He didn't go to jail but had to live with the fact he killed his own kid. This is actual case law. I don't remember the name. If anyone does please tell me)
reply
Rebekah
From what I remember from working at a realtor scheduling company, gate codes are not considered secured information. That is to say, the number is given out to so many people (food delivery, mail delivery, friends, family, repair workers, and relators) that the information is not considered a security risk.
And you can enter a gated community (even if they are private roads, if you've been given the code to the gate and have reason to be there. (I don't know anything about I'd the gate was left open)
Soooooo, it's not technically illegal to be in one of these communities, if one of them had the code or if the gate was left open- they could argue they had cause to be in the community, because they wanted to speak with the Mayor.
I'm no legal expert, but I do know just a little about laws surrounding gated/private communities.
reply
From what I remember from working at a realtor scheduling company, gate codes are not considered secured information. That is to say, the number is given out to so many people (food delivery, mail delivery, friends, family, repair workers, and relators) that the information is not considered a security risk.
And you can enter a gated community (even if they are private roads, if you've been given the code to the gate and have reason to be there. (I don't know anything about I'd the gate was left open)
Soooooo, it's not technically illegal to be in one of these communities, if one of them had the code or if the gate was left open- they could argue they had cause to be in the community, because they wanted to speak with the Mayor.
I'm no legal expert, but I do know just a little about laws surrounding gated/private communities.
reply
Toxic_Waste92
Common sense gun use comes with many simple rules. One of the most simple and basic rules is Don t point a gun at anyone or anything you don t intend to kill. That s regardless of wether or not the gun is loaded. You have the right to bare arms and the right to defend yourself. Clearly we need more information, yes it s a gated community, yes it s private property, but peaceful protest is just that peaceful protest. If they managed to gain entrance to the community without breaking in then they clearly weren t violent and dangerous. If your pointing a weapon at people who aren t violent and dangerous I don t think you should be free potential charges for unlawful use of a firearm. If they did break into the community, damaged property and posed an actual risk to the community and their homes then they shouldn t be charged.
reply
Common sense gun use comes with many simple rules. One of the most simple and basic rules is Don t point a gun at anyone or anything you don t intend to kill. That s regardless of wether or not the gun is loaded. You have the right to bare arms and the right to defend yourself. Clearly we need more information, yes it s a gated community, yes it s private property, but peaceful protest is just that peaceful protest. If they managed to gain entrance to the community without breaking in then they clearly weren t violent and dangerous. If your pointing a weapon at people who aren t violent and dangerous I don t think you should be free potential charges for unlawful use of a firearm. If they did break into the community, damaged property and posed an actual risk to the community and their homes then they shouldn t be charged.
reply
Tsvetelina
I'm Bulgarian, and my country will receive 29 billion euro in grants from the EU. I don't think our government deserves the money. Those people are incredibly corrupt and I (and many others) am sure they'll just line their own pockets. Those billions won't even reach the businesses and the people they're supposed to help.
Bulgaria is the poorest country in the EU and we receive a ton of grants because of that. Most of the money gets stolen, so our leaders can live in luxury while the rest of the country struggles to survive with 300 euros a month. We've been protesting every day for two weeks now, I really hope we can finally make a change.
reply
I'm Bulgarian, and my country will receive 29 billion euro in grants from the EU. I don't think our government deserves the money. Those people are incredibly corrupt and I (and many others) am sure they'll just line their own pockets. Those billions won't even reach the businesses and the people they're supposed to help.
Bulgaria is the poorest country in the EU and we receive a ton of grants because of that. Most of the money gets stolen, so our leaders can live in luxury while the rest of the country struggles to survive with 300 euros a month. We've been protesting every day for two weeks now, I really hope we can finally make a change.
reply
x5ofspadez
I m about as left as they come, but as far as the McCloskys and the use of force. I think that the court will find they are well within their right to defend their home. The fact that there is even a charge is absurd and imo the exact scenario where the 2nd Amendment is useful. This really shouldn t be a political case however the president and his lackeys Had to jump in and defend the family which inherently makes them look bad. Colin Noir has a good video going over this. The woman could be in trouble because she was pointing the firearm at the protesters. The husband however, despite terrible gun handling, did absolutely nothing wrong.
reply
I m about as left as they come, but as far as the McCloskys and the use of force. I think that the court will find they are well within their right to defend their home. The fact that there is even a charge is absurd and imo the exact scenario where the 2nd Amendment is useful. This really shouldn t be a political case however the president and his lackeys Had to jump in and defend the family which inherently makes them look bad. Colin Noir has a good video going over this. The woman could be in trouble because she was pointing the firearm at the protesters. The husband however, despite terrible gun handling, did absolutely nothing wrong.
reply
Mike
In the McCloskey case, the protesters had no business being on the streets of a private, gated community. The protesters should stand on public ground, just like they should stand on the sidewalk and not someone's front yard or garden.
Also, if you look at it from the McCloskeys perspective: that is a large crowd of loudly angry protesters coming through a gate they should not come through.
I have not seen how the protesters got the gate open, but it is a private street with a sign at the gate stating that. I do not know if private streets/cummunities are covered by the castle doctrine, but the protesters were trespassing
reply
In the McCloskey case, the protesters had no business being on the streets of a private, gated community. The protesters should stand on public ground, just like they should stand on the sidewalk and not someone's front yard or garden.
Also, if you look at it from the McCloskeys perspective: that is a large crowd of loudly angry protesters coming through a gate they should not come through.
I have not seen how the protesters got the gate open, but it is a private street with a sign at the gate stating that. I do not know if private streets/cummunities are covered by the castle doctrine, but the protesters were trespassing
reply
jevikwarrior
Dude, i know its an unbiased opinion but come one. As much as anyone wants to shit on americans using guns this is not the case to do it. First you have to see it from the couples point of view (which the judge will do. Do you think they felt threatened? Yup private property you are on my yard. I've seen the news, protests can turn violent. What are the consequences of the actions? Nothing got broken/stolen/shot that seems perfect. Were the protest peaceful? well maybe a gun pointed at you made you think oh well finally there will be consequences to my actions, therefore, no vioelence?
reply
Dude, i know its an unbiased opinion but come one. As much as anyone wants to shit on americans using guns this is not the case to do it. First you have to see it from the couples point of view (which the judge will do. Do you think they felt threatened? Yup private property you are on my yard. I've seen the news, protests can turn violent. What are the consequences of the actions? Nothing got broken/stolen/shot that seems perfect. Were the protest peaceful? well maybe a gun pointed at you made you think oh well finally there will be consequences to my actions, therefore, no vioelence?
reply
Alpha
Honestly with the gun couple news I m torn. Yes the protesters were not going to that house but that neighborhood was supposed to be gated, meaning that area wanted to not let anyone just walk in. On the other hand the protesters should have the ability to peacefully protest in public areas. In that area was private than I don t think the protesters should have gone in there, maybe instead around the neighborhood or at the gate but not in private property.
reply
Honestly with the gun couple news I m torn. Yes the protesters were not going to that house but that neighborhood was supposed to be gated, meaning that area wanted to not let anyone just walk in. On the other hand the protesters should have the ability to peacefully protest in public areas. In that area was private than I don t think the protesters should have gone in there, maybe instead around the neighborhood or at the gate but not in private property.
reply
Ishik
I was supposed to move to Germany just as Covid hit the US and trapped me here. Seeing reports like this on how the EU responds to crises by comparison to the US depresses me to no end.
Even just listening to how Phil discusses the matter, the discourse is just so much more elevated. The conversation is about how many billions of dollars should be grants vs loans, instead of having to explain the difference to the president.
reply
I was supposed to move to Germany just as Covid hit the US and trapped me here. Seeing reports like this on how the EU responds to crises by comparison to the US depresses me to no end.
Even just listening to how Phil discusses the matter, the discourse is just so much more elevated. The conversation is about how many billions of dollars should be grants vs loans, instead of having to explain the difference to the president.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
14:20
15:18
